rone: (cheese)

IPv4 addresses are the souls of aliens that perished in a giant volcanic explosion millions of years ago, whereas IPv6 is clear technology.

rone: (bofh)

Two weeks, i hit LISA for the first time in 12 years.  I can't really explain why it took me so long to return, other than the typical excuse of indolence (and, really, from a professional standpoint, that is simply bad form).  It was good to see [livejournal.com profile] _nicolai_, [livejournal.com profile] pir, [livejournal.com profile] gothgeekgrrl, and [livejournal.com profile] gallifreyan, as well as Steve VanDevender, ex-coworkers Grant Talarico and Aaron Fraser, and talk.bizarre's own George William Herbert (pure chance encounter), and i indulged in the opportunity to show them around downtown San José for lunch at Morocco's, Hanuman, and Mezcal.

One thing i learned at LISA was from ARIN regarding the imminence of IPv4 address space exhaustion; if everything breaks right, the last available /8s will be handed out by IANA to the regional internet registries sometime in the second quarter of 2012.  So, adding IPv6 is moving out of the "hardcore early adopter" stage into the "prudent proactive user" stage (but feel free to disagree and call me names).  I also picked up some good tips regarding interviewing, résumé writing, and becoming a better senior sysadmin.

As of this week, i've been working during the day, filling in for someone else in the group who's out (the group is running rather lean as of late).  It's been nice to see people and actually get to have questions answered without having to wake someone up (although i get the impression today that far too many people have checked out early for Thanksgiving).  I hope that i'll be on days permanently soon.

rone: (southpark)

<dkim-milter-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>: host mail.sourceforge.net[66.35.250.206] said:
  550-Postmaster verification failed while checking <rone@eforceglobal.com>
  550-Called:   209.177.149.166
  550-Sent:     RCPT TO:<postmaster@eforceglobal.com>
  550-Response: 550 <postmaster@eforceglobal.com>: Recipient address rejected: eforceglobal.com
  550-Several RFCs state that you are required to have a postmaster
  550-mailbox for each mail domain. This host does not accept mail
  550-from domains whose servers reject the postmaster address.
  550 Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Yeah, yeah, it would be nice if eFORCE's mail server were RFC-compliant, but at the same time, i'd love to print out section 2.10 of RFC 793, roll it up, and smack SourceForge's nose with it.

rone: (Default)

<dkim-milter-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>: host mail.sourceforge.net[66.35.250.206] said:
  550-Postmaster verification failed while checking <rone@eforceglobal.com>
  550-Called:   209.177.149.166
  550-Sent:     RCPT TO:<postmaster@eforceglobal.com>
  550-Response: 550 <postmaster@eforceglobal.com>: Recipient address rejected: eforceglobal.com
  550-Several RFCs state that you are required to have a postmaster
  550-mailbox for each mail domain. This host does not accept mail
  550-from domains whose servers reject the postmaster address.
  550 Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Yeah, yeah, it would be nice if eFORCE's mail server were RFC-compliant, but at the same time, i'd love to print out section 2.10 of RFC 793, roll it up, and smack SourceForge's nose with it.

rone: (desolation jones)

Dear [livejournal.com profile] dr_strych9: please supplement my arguments against real-time blackhole lists with this delightful story about a blackhole list that came back to life fifteen months after its death and caused all its subscribers' incoming mail to bounce.

rone: (Default)

Dear [livejournal.com profile] dr_strych9: please supplement my arguments against real-time blackhole lists with this delightful story about a blackhole list that came back to life fifteen months after its death and caused all its subscribers' incoming mail to bounce.

rone: (peligro! hay cocodrilos!)

... but i hear the train coming anyway.

My career is stuck in a bad spot, where i can't afford to work for a place whose output isn't objectionable (like a university or a non-profit organization), so i have to take a job with companies that produce abhorrent things, like social networks or online ad frameworks, and are either megacorporations ridden with politics and bureaucracy, or are minuscule startups run by delusional megalomaniacs who overwork everyone, or they're midsized companies run by decent, smart people and therefore are a target ripe for acquisition and reëducation.  And i'm still too far off my winemaking certificate to seriously enact a career change (and we're back to the "can't afford" part, anyway).  The small business is already a vanishing thing, but it's practically mythic in this industry.  I wonder whether there's anything that can be done about it.

rone: (Default)

... but i hear the train coming anyway.

My career is stuck in a bad spot, where i can't afford to work for a place whose output isn't objectionable (like a university or a non-profit organization), so i have to take a job with companies that produce abhorrent things, like social networks or online ad frameworks, and are either megacorporations ridden with politics and bureaucracy, or are minuscule startups run by delusional megalomaniacs who overwork everyone, or they're midsized companies run by decent, smart people and therefore are a target ripe for acquisition and reëducation.  And i'm still too far off my winemaking certificate to seriously enact a career change (and we're back to the "can't afford" part, anyway).  The small business is already a vanishing thing, but it's practically mythic in this industry.  I wonder whether there's anything that can be done about it.

rone: (violin)

rone: (Default)

rone: (bofh)

In regards to a slight problem at Google Blogsearch that [livejournal.com profile] tongodeon mentioned:

Thank you for your note. We understand your concern in this matter, and
we'd like to reassure you that Blog Search (beta) was designed to respect
robots.txt files and both the NOINDEX and NOFOLLOW meta tags.

We're aware of the problem you're reporting, and our engineers are
currently investigating. We hope to have this fixed soon. We appreciate
your patience, and thanks for taking the time to write.

Regards,
The Google Team

rone: (Default)

In regards to a slight problem at Google Blogsearch that [livejournal.com profile] tongodeon mentioned:

Thank you for your note. We understand your concern in this matter, and
we'd like to reassure you that Blog Search (beta) was designed to respect
robots.txt files and both the NOINDEX and NOFOLLOW meta tags.

We're aware of the problem you're reporting, and our engineers are
currently investigating. We hope to have this fixed soon. We appreciate
your patience, and thanks for taking the time to write.

Regards,
The Google Team

rone: (what the fuck)

So when and why did Google start passing or setting cookies for your query's top hit, before you actually click on the link?

rone: (Default)

So when and why did Google start passing or setting cookies for your query's top hit, before you actually click on the link?

rone: (southpark)

VeriSlime is now suing ICANN because only VeriSlime has the authority to impose its will on the Internet. Or something.

rone: (Default)

VeriSlime is now suing ICANN because only VeriSlime has the authority to impose its will on the Internet. Or something.

rone: (quiet)

There are nearly 34 million domain names in the rootgTLD servers. Over 24 million of those are .com domains.

rone: (Default)

There are nearly 34 million domain names in the rootgTLD servers. Over 24 million of those are .com domains.

rone: (quiet)

More on the .com/.net A wildcards:

The Internet Software Consortium, the nonprofit organization that develops BIND software for Internet domain name directories, is writing an "urgent patch" for Internet service providers and others who want to block customers from a new Site Finder service from VeriSign Inc.
[...]
"We're making this patch available because our customers are screaming for it," [ISC's Paul] Vixie said.
[...]
VeriSign spokesman Brian O'Shaughnessy said Tuesday that individual service providers were free to configure their systems so customers would bypass Site Finder. But he questioned whether releasing a patch to do so would violate Internet standards.
[...]
Earlier this year, a suburban Washington company called Paxfire Inc. tested a similar service for ".biz" and ".us" names, but the U.S. government and a private oversight board asked Paxfire to suspend it after a few weeks pending a review, Paxfire chairman Mark Lewyn said.

rone: (Default)

More on the .com/.net A wildcards:

The Internet Software Consortium, the nonprofit organization that develops BIND software for Internet domain name directories, is writing an "urgent patch" for Internet service providers and others who want to block customers from a new Site Finder service from VeriSign Inc.
[...]
"We're making this patch available because our customers are screaming for it," [ISC's Paul] Vixie said.
[...]
VeriSign spokesman Brian O'Shaughnessy said Tuesday that individual service providers were free to configure their systems so customers would bypass Site Finder. But he questioned whether releasing a patch to do so would violate Internet standards.
[...]
Earlier this year, a suburban Washington company called Paxfire Inc. tested a similar service for ".biz" and ".us" names, but the U.S. government and a private oversight board asked Paxfire to suspend it after a few weeks pending a review, Paxfire chairman Mark Lewyn said.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 05:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios