caxap

Apr. 17th, 2008 09:43 am
rone: (Default)
[personal profile] rone

a box of russian sugar cubes

This box of Russian sugar cubes sits in gBox's kitchen.  My coworker Lex assures me that Russian sugar is sweeter than American sugar.

Date: 2008-04-17 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jsbowden.livejournal.com
In Soviet Russia, Sugar sweetens YOU!


Is their sucrose special or something?

Date: 2008-04-17 05:59 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (Default)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
I almost used that as the subject line.

Maybe it's a beet thing.

Date: 2008-04-17 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] motis.livejournal.com
American tongues aren't as bitter as Russian tongues.

Date: 2008-04-17 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gallifreyan.livejournal.com
Gave rise to a familiar but often misquoted Russian saying...

Caxaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap?

"fast-dissolving"

Date: 2008-04-17 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notr.livejournal.com
suggests that maybe it's invert sugar, which is indeed sweeter, or maybe it's just in smaller crystals, which in solid form will hit the tongue faster.

Re: "fast-dissolving"

Date: 2008-04-18 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] motis.livejournal.com
Isn't invert sugar also zero-calorie? It's my understanding that the body doesn't recognize it as food. If this is the case, why on Earth do we use nasty-tasting crap like Splenda in our diet soda?

Date: 2008-04-18 08:50 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (clue jar - take two)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Invert sugar is, in fact, not zero-calorie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invert_sugar).

Date: 2008-04-18 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] motis.livejournal.com
Either I was hoaxed a long time ago, or there's some other substance that was once upon a time called "invert sugar" that isn't what is called "invert sugar" now. I remember reading an article about it back in the '80s or '90s that I believe described a substance that was a stereoisomer of sucrose (in other words, comparing the two would be like comparing a left-hand glove with a right-hand glove). Actual invert sugar apparently isn't a stereoisomer, it's just sucrose broken down by an acid and some heat into glucose and fructose.

Color me confused by old memories and new information.

Never heard it called "invert sugar"

Date: 2008-04-19 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notr.livejournal.com
I've heard L-glucose, the reversed stereoisomer of normal D-glucose or dextrose, called "sinistrose," which I never realized was French for "pessimism."

Date: 2008-04-19 03:39 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (drowning cat)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Chemists prefer levu- to sinistr- for the left-handed prefix.

Re: Never heard it called "invert sugar"

Date: 2008-04-19 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] motis.livejournal.com
How fitting... I'm sure it was a newspaper article I read that in, so it's just another example of the popular media being a poor source of scientific information.

Date: 2008-04-18 01:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tau-iota-mu-c.livejournal.com
It's probably made out of real sugar instead of some corn beetroot hybrid frankenzoid mixture.

Since I came back to Melbourne, I've noticed all the Asian restaurants are making prawn in sugar cane dishes. Sugar cane is less sweet than what I expected it to be.

Date: 2008-04-18 05:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epileptikitty.livejournal.com
And it tastes like grass. Because it is.

Date: 2008-04-18 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tau-iota-mu-c.livejournal.com
Num num. Except that now I want to hack up a furball.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 04:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios