[Supreme Court Justice Antonin] Scalia said the Texas ban did not infringe a "fundamental right." [...] "The court has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda," Scalia wrote for the three, according to the AP. [...] "The court has taken sides in the culture war," Scalia said, adding that he has "nothing against homosexuals."
It must be a horrible thing for a man as smart as Scalia to be reduced to saying things like "the so-called homosexual agenda" and noting he doesn't have a problem with gay people. And if having sex in your own home isn't a fundamental right, what the hell is?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rone
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 10:06 am (UTC)"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."
(Rick Santorum, Republican Senator from PA, in a AP newswire interview story (http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/news/politics/5689527.htm))
If he can't tell consensual sex from incest, I hope he's single and sterilized. Really.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 12:13 pm (UTC)Check out my user info page for links to an explanation. Or see if the userpic on this comment rings a bell. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-26 12:12 pm (UTC)