RING RING ORACLE CLUEPHONE FOR YOU
Dec. 7th, 2006 10:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Maybe someone can call Larry fucking Ellison and get him to spend some of his yacht racing petty cash on a goddamn QA box.
Bug No. 5389730 Filed 13-JUL-2006 Updated 30-OCT-2006 Product Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition Product Version 10.2.0.1 Platform Generic Platform Version No Data Database Version 10.2.0.1 Affects Platforms Port-Specific Severity Severe Loss of Service Status Development to Q/A Base Bug N/A Fixed in Product Version 11.0 Problem statement: 10.2.0.1 32BIT OCI EXECUTABLES FAILS WITH ORA-12154 ON SOLARIS 10 X86-64(AMD64) [...] PROBLEM: -------- 10.2.0.1 32bit OCI exceutable built using Oracle make file fails with ORA-12154. The exact same code works when a 64bit executable is used. sqlplus is 64bit executable so the connection works. The problem is only on seen on solaris 10 X86-64(AMD64) DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS: -------------------- Inhouse tried the test on both regular solaris 10(celcsol3) and x86(celcx86b) and was not able to reproduce the error. REPRODUCIBILITY: ---------------- Inhouse cannot find solaris 10 X86-64(AMD64) testbox.
Wow.
Date: 2006-12-08 07:21 am (UTC)Thib ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 02:39 pm (UTC)Fucking losers. Oracle is going to collapse in on themselves through sheer incompetence... And Microsoft will rape the remains.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:26 pm (UTC)Building out a Solaris x86 box from custom parts used to be a perilous process. Has it gotten better?
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:34 pm (UTC)I'm still scarred by my efforts to install Solaris x86 (i think it was 2.6) just over seven years ago. Jumpstart was brutally stupid, so i installed the OS manually on 20 tank-like servers that were going to London, except they didn't.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 10:21 pm (UTC)Must Meet Their Dope Dealer....
Date: 2006-12-08 06:14 pm (UTC)Clearly they are a Bud Above The Rest....