Entry tags:
RING RING ORACLE CLUEPHONE FOR YOU
Maybe someone can call Larry fucking Ellison and get him to spend some of his yacht racing petty cash on a goddamn QA box.
Bug No. 5389730 Filed 13-JUL-2006 Updated 30-OCT-2006 Product Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition Product Version 10.2.0.1 Platform Generic Platform Version No Data Database Version 10.2.0.1 Affects Platforms Port-Specific Severity Severe Loss of Service Status Development to Q/A Base Bug N/A Fixed in Product Version 11.0 Problem statement: 10.2.0.1 32BIT OCI EXECUTABLES FAILS WITH ORA-12154 ON SOLARIS 10 X86-64(AMD64) [...] PROBLEM: -------- 10.2.0.1 32bit OCI exceutable built using Oracle make file fails with ORA-12154. The exact same code works when a 64bit executable is used. sqlplus is 64bit executable so the connection works. The problem is only on seen on solaris 10 X86-64(AMD64) DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS: -------------------- Inhouse tried the test on both regular solaris 10(celcsol3) and x86(celcx86b) and was not able to reproduce the error. REPRODUCIBILITY: ---------------- Inhouse cannot find solaris 10 X86-64(AMD64) testbox.
Wow.
(Anonymous) 2006-12-08 07:21 am (UTC)(link)Thib ;-)
no subject
Fucking losers. Oracle is going to collapse in on themselves through sheer incompetence... And Microsoft will rape the remains.
no subject
Building out a Solaris x86 box from custom parts used to be a perilous process. Has it gotten better?
no subject
I'm still scarred by my efforts to install Solaris x86 (i think it was 2.6) just over seven years ago. Jumpstart was brutally stupid, so i installed the OS manually on 20 tank-like servers that were going to London, except they didn't.
no subject
Must Meet Their Dope Dealer....
Clearly they are a Bud Above The Rest....