![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A continuation of the discussion i was having with endymion23:
"Survival of the fittest" does not lose its meaning with sentience; sentience merely redefines "fittest". "Survival of the fittest" is glib tripe, anyway, right up there with "meaning of life" and "free will". It sounds cool; it isn't.
You misunderstand my statement of having something to prove. I have lots to prove to those whom i deem it necessary: myself, my wife, my family. I don't have to prove the world anything. I don't have to prove YOU anything.
I appreciate the condescending admission that i have "some degree of merit." My heart is filled with blood.
And we are not "more" than animals. We're just very smart animals. This is an important distinction.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 04:36 pm (UTC)Previous recessions were tolerable, as evidenced by the fact that they were tolerated. Even the 1970s stagflation was tolerable. The economy is not currently intolerable, as we are currently tolerating it: QED. The Great Depression, I can see as 'intolerable.'
'The economy currently sucks' is a justifiable, if debatable, statement. 'The economy is currently intolerable and has been for years' is unadulterated balderdash.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 04:42 pm (UTC)"has been for years" technically means it's been so for two or more years, which jibes with the market starting its descent towards the bottom of God's Port-A-Potty in early 2000.
Also, yu0 = fag0rt.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 04:59 pm (UTC)Also, yu0 = fag0rt.
GUILTY AS CHARGED!!! [minces away]
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 05:53 pm (UTC)and that name calling is so helpful to your debate
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 07:07 pm (UTC)... you poopypants.