unknown unknowns
Dec. 3rd, 2003 11:09 pmThanks to the talented Penny Hill: Rummy wins the coveted Foot in Mouth award for his soon-to-be-classic 'unknown unknowns' speech.
I still find it hard to believe there's an electrical appliance maker named SMEG.
It gets better
Date: 2003-12-04 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 06:24 am (UTC)I also don't think Rumsfeld is a bumbler, or that his speeches are mangled in any way. What they have is a dazzling emptiness. I'm not sure what the "unknown unknowns" speech should be called, but it's not inept.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 12:08 pm (UTC)I think there's probably a clearer way to express what he said, but that he even went into that ramble is a bit odd.
It
Date: 2003-12-04 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 04:39 pm (UTC)I think
Date: 2003-12-04 05:00 pm (UTC)BTW, did he say "known knowns" or "no knowns"? Most of the reports I read at the time said the latter, which is even more baffling. But the former is just as much gobbledegook, being tautologous and, well, tautologous.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 05:54 pm (UTC)