rone: (Default)
[personal profile] rone

I received a call from my House Representative, Zoe Lofgren (and i note that it's not Zoë because she doesn't pronounce the 'e' in her name), asking me to join a phone conference about health care reform.  The various people who chimed in with comments and questions ran the gamut from people who showed various levels of support and opposition who made civil and thoughtful contributions, to outright morons, such as one dolt who said, "I don't want the government in charge of health care.  I'm an employer and people tell me they don't want benefits, and if they need anything they'll just get it for free at the emergency room."  Another clown added, "Health insurance companies want to turn a profit, and there's nothing wrong with making a profit; that's what this country was founded on."  Funny, i thought this country was founded on tax evasion.

Date: 2009-09-08 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] h-postmortemus.livejournal.com
The other clown is correct though. Health insurance companies want to turn a profit. That's why they exist, as any company or business does. If you take away the ability for a business to make money, it has no reason to exist.
Greed is an intrinsic property of human nature.

Date: 2009-09-08 03:35 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (scohol)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
There are, in fact, non-profit organizations that provide health care, such as Kaiser Permanente. And there is no proof that anyone wants to take away a business's ability to make money, nor is there an effective way to do so short of declaring their business illegal (such as Prohibition did to wineries and distilleries). Greed might be intrinsic, but it is often ruinous to the greedy person.

Date: 2009-09-08 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] h-postmortemus.livejournal.com
Note that I said "company", not "non-profit organization". :)
The concern for-profit companies have is that by offering a publicly funded option, many people will choose to use that instead of a for-profit insurance company. Which will reduce their profitability. And there's no doubt many people will switch to a public option if it's at all cheaper than a for-profit option. So I don't recommend making arguments against these facts. Instead, focus on what level of impact there will be.


You are 100% right about greed. It's one of humanity's biggest challenges, overcoming our own nature that sabotages our advancement.

Date: 2009-09-09 04:55 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (mesna)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
If they're worried about their profitability, maybe they should offer more in their product, like many other companies do when they compete against publicly funded alternatives.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 01:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios