When they use the phrase "adult supervision", i don't think it means what they think it means. What the fuck were these people thinking?
Page Summary
erikred.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rimrunner.livejournal.com - (no subject)
deirdremoon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kawgirl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
urbeatle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
crisper.livejournal.com - (no subject)
crisper.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arian1.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drieuxster.livejournal.com - Would this be a bad time to talk about pre-adolescent soldiers?
ratphooey.livejournal.com - (no subject)
xlerb.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tronpublic.livejournal.com - (no subject)
benchilada.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Blue for Motion by
- Resources: Wordpress Motion
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 08:24 pm (UTC)As an ADULT I'd find handling something like that challenging, what on Earth made anyone think it was good idea to let an 8-year-old fire it?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 02:28 am (UTC)I can't believe nobody else had their hand on or above the gun, even if he was a big 8-year-old.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 08:43 pm (UTC)I started out being snarky enough to laugh at the police officer who said "backfire" instead of "recoil", and then thought, No, that must have been pretty horrific. He's allowed to be shaken enough to not have vocabulary.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 08:49 pm (UTC)Yeah, that's probably a news story that will make the top 5 bad things I've heard this week. It's rare as you know, but it happens. I can't believe the parent gave an 8 year old permission to shoot that sort of weapon. It makes you wonder if that adult has any business at an event like that, himself. And the brother? Yeah, likely to be a client one day...
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 09:24 pm (UTC)I'm a little disturbed by that conjuction, "and". Presumably, they mean "Police said... and called..." and not that the boy "was with ... and called..."
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 09:51 pm (UTC)"There is NO choice of sub-gun for an 8 year old. Period. Ever."
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 12:31 am (UTC)http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2008/10/police_identify_6.html?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed6
The father apparently thought the gun was small and light enough for his kid to use. That seems so odd to me, that a man who apparently loves himself some guns thought an 8-year-old could handle an Uzi. He'd probably been promising this to his kid for months.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 02:34 am (UTC)I think the relevant distiction is that with MP-5 and larger, your second hand can stabilize the gun from somewhere other than the same spot as your first hand. MP5 takes all kinds of accessories including a folding stock or an extra handle near the business end, whereas the Uzi remains a short gun with a long clip, like the Tec-9.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 07:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 09:49 pm (UTC)Would this be a bad time to talk about pre-adolescent soldiers?
Date: 2008-10-27 10:11 pm (UTC)At which point we get to ask the other side of the question, what is so wrong with public school educations that an 8 year old boy does NOT understand the safety requirements associated with using personal point defense weapon systems.
Now more than ever, we need our own Caribou Barbie to change the way that the failed liberal educational system has been stabbing our troops in the back with the failure to get them the cheaper child labor that would be available in the Free Trade In Free Markets...
Re: Would this be a bad time to talk about pre-adolescent soldiers?
Date: 2008-10-27 10:19 pm (UTC)(re-reading your comment, I suspect I have been hooked. well played if so.)
Re: Would this be a bad time to talk about pre-adolescent soldiers?
Date: 2008-10-28 02:38 am (UTC)as for hooking... the tragedy is that I feel for pre-adolescent soldier's around the world. It is a part of my understanding, having been able to field strip my first military grade Full Automatic Assault Weapon before I was 11, but that was merely 'traditional family values' - the part of the reality space that went with the father/son bonding that 'the gun came with the job'.
The was nothing my father could do with the fact that my introduction to international terrorist geopolitical warfare event sequences preceded my learning that girls had teats, and/or that they are much more interesting to play field stripping sequences with....
My introduction to modern low intensity asynchronous warfare scenarioization occurred right after walking that really cute young mathematician home, and being all polite and civil, and then trying to make tracks back home to get my feet under father's table before dinner was served... and those Cheese Eating Surrender Monkie Commie Rat Bastards thot that blowing something up on behalf of the Great Socialist Solidatarity should take precedence over my interests.... FREAKING RED COMMIE RAT BASTARDS!!!!
Remind me again, in my next life, normal parents, normal neighborhoods, normal life sequences.... Clearly Teats Before Tactical Deployments...
oh yes, Please note, the child was with, not that he was, a certified instructor.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-27 10:46 pm (UTC)You'd think the kid's father had seen enough gunshot wounds that he'd never want his kid around guns at all.
Let alone a gun like that.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 06:48 am (UTC)BTW, this show (http://www.dgmlive.com/archive.htm?artist=16&show=1301) is pretty cool.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 04:21 am (UTC)Wow, two drum kits again? Wild.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-28 01:56 pm (UTC)