> What is "podcast" compared to "MP3 for download on some kind of RSS
> feed" anyway?
That description only captures the facts and completely misses the
self-congratulatory wankfest. Podcasts are nothing without the "we're
changing the world and are at the forefront of technology" wankfest.
Thank you,
allbery.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 03:08 am (UTC)If only there were one for the Web 2.0 wankfest, the Rails wankfest, and the "I'm a little twenty-something and look! I just invented the intarweb" wankfest, I'd be fully wanked out.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 04:06 am (UTC)Wankers. The iPod is lame enough and anyone using the term "podcast" isn't just a wanker, they're a stupid wanker.
Blame the entire thing on the whole Apple culture. You don't buy and enjoy a product, you're expected to join some sort of cult. The cultists who can't understand why you don't use your crappy Powerbook anymore because it's another example of overpriced underbuilt failing technology, and the same cultists that bounce up and down because Apple apparently invented this amazing way of connecting discs to your machine that uses, like, OPTICAL FIBRE, man, like, how cool is, like that? *bangs head against SureStore tray*. Yes, the actually came up with this line while staring vacuously at two FCAL hubs and an FCAL JBOD.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 07:40 am (UTC)At least with the video podcast, you can pretend to poke them in the eyes with your cursor.
I need a gizmo that lets you crush their heads with the cursor.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 11:27 am (UTC)If I was in charge of speech I would try to coin something less timely than an unauthorized tie-in to the hot consumer item of the shopping season. The past dozen years of neophilia has not been easy on the English language. But podcasts are a persistent format, love 'em or hate 'em -- personally, I haven't found one that didn't make me mourn the time wasted.
At least 'Podcast' does not use 'blog' as a root word.
But I do have to tip my hat to the guy who posted his family's vacation photos on Flickr and got Cory Doctorow to link to them only because the guy used the words 'photoblog' and 'Disneyworld'. Not that yanking Cory's chain is all that hard, but I'd have expected him to see through that.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 02:52 pm (UTC)But I like my iPod and I like those two podcasts, and I'm not going to stop listening to either because somebody else is a wanker.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 04:01 pm (UTC)Naturally there's a disclaimer that you don't need to have an iPod to use a podcast.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 05:29 pm (UTC)All of my podcasts are currently either real radio programs, or exiled TechTV personalities.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 07:21 pm (UTC)For more head-explody fun, Google "Library 2.0". Word to my professional colleagues: THIS IS NOT MAKING US LOOK HIP, PEOPLE.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 07:59 pm (UTC)Why wait?
Date: 2006-08-22 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 11:26 pm (UTC)http://www.idlewords.com/2004/08/an_audioblogging_manifesto.htm
I actually like podcasts because, as a LA-to-SF driver, I frequently find myself in occasions where I can listen but I can't read. I quite enjoy time-shifted radio, which some but not all podcasts are. Conversely, the Digg Podast annoys me quite a bit since they're basically reading URLs off a screen and laughing at visual stuff I can't see.