rone: (Default)
[personal profile] rone

"I say, follow your dreams!  Even if they're about a giant spider with your father's head and he keeps stealing your penis."

        — Dean Venture

Date: 2008-06-24 02:02 am (UTC)
thedarkages: (Default)
From: [personal profile] thedarkages
I've always liked the third movement of the Ninth. Pity Gracenote doesn't realize that it's by Beethoven.

Date: 2008-06-24 02:06 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (picassohead)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Well, the performing artist is displayed and not the composer, as is the case with the popular music i have. There is some argument over whether classical music should be displayed the same way as popular music. [livejournal.com profile] mmcirvin or [livejournal.com profile] iayork might know more.

Date: 2008-06-24 03:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iayork.livejournal.com
If you use a Mac, and post with XJournal, there's a simple enough workaround. I use a little applescript to swap in the correct form for my classical music.

---------------
tell application "iTunes"
set This_Artist to artist of current track
set this_album to album of current track
set This_Composer to composer of current track
end tell
activate
set Track_Info to This_Composer & " - " & this_album & " - " & This_Artist

activate application "Xjournal"
tell application "System Events"
tell process "Xjournal"
-- GUI Scripting statements:
set value of text field 2 of window 1 to Track_Info

end tell
end tell

---------------------------------

In my case I save the name of classical works as "album", but you could just switch album to grouping or whatever.

I save the script in the script menu, so it appears in the menubar pulldown.

GUI scripting needs to be enabled.

Date: 2008-06-24 04:56 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (mesna)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
1) What about us Windows lusers?

2) I am uncomfortable treating classical music differently. Don't the musicians deserve to be listed? What about the conductor? Should the composer have chosen a more easily recognizable title for their work than Symphony/Concerto/Sonata and a number, despite the fact that the composer couldn't possibly have foreseen that centuries down the road, obsessive music fans would argue over nomenclature like their lives depended on it?

Date: 2008-06-24 06:35 am (UTC)
ext_243: (spltor)
From: [identity profile] xlerb.livejournal.com
I am uncomfortable treating classical music differently.

So, you chromasort all your records, then?

Date: 2008-06-24 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pootrootbeer.livejournal.com
I tag my classical music in iTunes thusly:

Artist: (Soloist Name, if Deserved /) Conductor Name / Performing Group Name
Title: Title of Work: Mvt#. Title (or tempo marking) of movement
Composer: Composer (duh)
Album: Label and Catalog Number, just like pretentious journalists refer to classical recordings by
Year: copyright date of recording (original recording, if remastered for CD)

Except for showcase works like concerti, soloists usually do not deserve to be credited. Their egos are too big already.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 03:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios