dear fans of "the big lebowski"
Dec. 31st, 2007 10:56 pmWhat the fuck, over? This movie is not funny, it is not memorable, and it is not enjoyable. It's a story that reads like it was written by some pinhead with ADD who heavily self-medicates with marijuana; a ridiculous amount of random things happened for no damn discernible reason or even a more than tenuous connection between them. I am a charter member of the Jeff Bridges Fan Club and the way he was wasted was nearly criminal, and the same goes for Steve Buscemi. The movie needed a lot less John Goodman and a lot more John Turturro. It feels like some film student decided to ape the Coen brothers. If i hadn't rented this movie for free with a coupon, i would feel totally ripped off. Something about the movie made me dodge it when it came out, and all the years since, but i finally decided to fill in a gap in my Coen brothers movie track, and now i'm sorry. I blame all of you jerks.
Oh, by the way, since it seems that "watch it again another 10-40 times and you'll get it" is a really popular suggestion, i have two words for you: Stockholm syndrome.
Not for Everyone
Date: 2008-01-02 01:42 am (UTC)There's nothing wrong with not getting the Big L. It's not meant to be understood by everyone. Everything in it, after the initial name confusion, does happen for a discernible reason, but Lebowski is a pinhead with ADD who self-medicates with marijuana, so it's not obvious from his view point what the reason is.
Goodman's character works for me, because I knew guys who came back from 'nam like that.
I won't tell you to see it N more times. If Big L doesn't work for someone on the first run, then it's not for them.
Even the most die-hard Coen brothers fan has a film they don't like. Barton Fink bored me, and Miller's Crossing tried too hard to be a Lynch film.
No disputing taste and all that.
Re: Not for Everyone
Date: 2008-01-02 10:01 pm (UTC)Re: Not for Everyone
Date: 2008-01-04 10:31 pm (UTC)