rone: (Default)
[personal profile] rone

I like SelectSmart because it takes the guesswork out of choosing the lesser evil.  Or something.

1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate  (100%)
2. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended)  (82%)
3. Dennis Kucinich  (77%)
4. Barack Obama  (75%)
5. Joseph Biden  (72%)
6. Hillary Clinton  (70%)
7. John Edwards  (67%)
8. Mike Gravel  (67%)
9. Al Gore (not announced)  (66%)
10. Bill Richardson  (66%)
11. Wesley Clark (not running, endorsed Clinton)  (64%)
12. Christopher Dodd  (62%)
13. Kent McManigal (campaign suspended)  (56%)
14. Michael Bloomberg (says he will not run)  (54%)
15. Ron Paul  (54%)
16. Elaine Brown  (40%)
17. Mike Huckabee  (36%)
18. Alan Keyes  (28%)
19. John McCain  (23%)
20. Chuck Hagel (not running)  (21%)
21. Newt Gingrich (says he will not run)  (21%)
22. Tommy Thompson (withdrawn, endorsed Giuliani)  (20%)
23. Tom Tancredo  (20%)
24. Mitt Romney  (19%)
25. Rudolph Giuliani  (18%)
26. Duncan Hunter  (18%)
27. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn)  (17%)
28. Fred Thompson  (16%)
29. Sam Brownback (withdrawn, endorsed McCain)  (15%)
30. Stephen Colbert (campaign ended)  (10%)

Date: 2007-11-12 02:51 am (UTC)
jwgh: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jwgh
My range is 87% to 3%. I suspect I am more of a stereotypical liberal than most.

Date: 2007-11-12 03:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nixzusehen.livejournal.com
Nothing like setting up a bunch of false dichotomies to make voting easier, eh?

We had the same top 4 (well, 3 really).

1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. Dennis Kucinich (90%) Information link
3. Barack Obama (85%) Information link
4. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended) (82%) Information link

Too bad they forgot to add, "How important is it that your candidate be loon." If I said "very" I might have gotten Dennis up to 95%. ;)

Date: 2007-11-12 03:45 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (cornholio)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Look, America's two-party system is fundamentally a false dichotomy. How else would you run this test?!

Date: 2007-11-12 03:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frosch.livejournal.com
kucinich, obama, gore, biden, hillary...

Kind of surprising, actually; I think of myself as more of an economic moderate.

I had colbert ahead of duncan hunter and jim gilmore.

I think there's a flaw with their survey questions, though. I don't see a question for

( ) Looks like one of Santa's elves
( ) Does not look like one of Santa's elves
( ) Neither

Date: 2007-11-12 03:48 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (cornholio)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
( ) Has a tall, smart, smokin' hot wife
( ) Does not have a tall, smart, smokin' hot wife
( ) Neither

Date: 2007-11-12 04:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frosch.livejournal.com
ok, tall and smart I'll give you, but "smokin' hot" is a little farther than I'm willing to go.

That might be personal bias on my part, though, based on the fact that she reminds me a little bit of my ex-wife.

Date: 2007-11-12 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisn.livejournal.com
Kucinich crops up near the top of a lot of people's lists. Either most of America are lefty liberal lunatic whackjobs, or he's not actually far off the beam and our political structure is being propped up by major media working on behalf of rightwing ideologues. Or something.

I don't think he'd be a good president even if he is politically aligned with my interests. He flusters easily once he's in an executive chair, and for a career as long as his it's strikingly short on positive accomplishments. It has nothing to do with his veganism or fondness for new-agey twaddle.

Date: 2007-11-12 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frosch.livejournal.com
that's sort of my point. We're pretty much all agreed that Kucinich is the candidate who's best looking out for our interests, but nobody will consider voting for the man, because we all know he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of winning, because he's so weird.

I haven't followed his career closely. I do have a Kucinich bumper sticker at home, but I haven't put it on the car yet.

I have to admit that I'm not impressed with the current crop of candidates. If Gore doesn't get in I may cross over in the primary and vote for McCain or even Romney in hopes we won't get an absolute nutjob like Giuliani running against Hillary.

Date: 2007-11-12 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisn.livejournal.com
He was the mayor of Cleveland while I lived in northern PA, and later when I lived in Ohio he was the Cuyahoga Cty rep in state senate. Kucinich was pretty good at handling local press but could never manage national newspeople well.

I don't think he's particularly weird. Neither in comparison with people I know personally nor our apparently-more-respectable national leaders, who seem to derive endless enjoyment from driving brush hogs, anoint themselves with oil whenever they're promoted in office, or take their miscarried fetuses home to show the kids.

Date: 2007-11-12 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khrister.livejournal.com
If I was an american, it tells me I should vote Kucinich, Obama, Dodd.

Of those, I've only heard of Obama...

Damn Canadian-ists!!!

Date: 2007-11-17 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
No worries on your lack of Patriotic-er-than-thou-nesss, hatred of American purity, virtue and goodness, and complete lack of pure-christian-theological rightness.

Soon, we'll bomb canada (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22bomb+canada%22+canadianist+%2Bsite%3Adrieuxster.livejournal.com) into smoking oblivion. Or something.

Date: 2007-11-12 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bungo.livejournal.com
Dodd 77%, Obama, Augustson, Edwards, Richardson. Not that any of them care about my vote.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 08:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios