my latest windmill to tilt at
Dec. 4th, 2003 08:45 pmEnglish already has perfectly useful gender-neutral pronouns: it, its. Use them. Do not use they, them for singular objects. Do not use the abhorrent, artificial 'hir', 'zie', 'blim', 'gur', or whatever. Yes, people can be called 'it'. Deal with it.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-05 06:56 am (UTC)Different approaches work better in different situations, obviously. The main objection to 's/he' that I've seen is that they're isn't an obvious way to pronounce it. (Well, that and that it's ugly, but probably all of the options look ugly to somebody.)
"He or she" can be awkward and distracting, particularly if repeated many times.
Exhausting! This is where, if you're writing, 's/he' or 'they' become tempting choices, because if we're talking about a real person whose gender is unknown using 'he' or 'she' is inappropriate, because it indicates knowledge of the person's gender. In speaking, I'd probably use 'they' -- even if I started off saying 'he or she' I would lapse into 'they' eventually, just because repeating 'he or she' is too much of a pain in the neck.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-05 07:11 am (UTC)Also, remember (this comes in handy in these situations), there ain't nothing wrong with the passive voice none, either.
Or somethin'.
Ah, the once legendary cry of the IBM information developer
Date: 2003-12-05 07:41 am (UTC)Boy, do I miss the old Uithoorn Nitpick Mob.
Re: Ah, the once legendary cry of the IBM information developer
Date: 2003-12-05 08:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-05 08:26 am (UTC)