rone: (Default)
[personal profile] rone

LXG was mediocre. Rent it if you must see it. No sense in going into how the movie differs from the graphic novel; basically, Hollywood took the concept and ran with it... far, far away. On its own merits, the movie does not stand so much as wobble.

Date: 2003-08-03 01:45 am (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
Alan Moore's opinion on the movie was along the lines of "Do you know how much bloody money they gave me?!" I think we can all concur.

Date: 2003-08-03 07:31 pm (UTC)
alfvaen: floatyhead (Default)
From: [personal profile] alfvaen
I never read the graphic novel, so I thought the movie was okay, even if the Nautilus did seem to navigate in areas of improbably shallow draft. I have low standards when it comes to movies, though. I didn't even mind "Wild Wild West" that much.

Date: 2003-08-03 07:42 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (excitable)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Essentially, it's just like "Mission: Impossible", where they took a very neat setup, stripped it to the bone, and took it in an utterly different, and WRONG, direction. I mean, the script bothered me 10 minutes into the movie -- even M:I had the decency to wait 30 minutes before i called shenanigans.

Date: 2003-08-08 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coldsleep.livejournal.com
Just heard from a friend today (with multiple connections to theater & comic industry) that Connery & the director nearly came to blows over the final version, and apparently Connery edited the hell out of it, resulting in the screen version?

Whatever, it sounded bizarre, yet interesting.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 08:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios