rone: (Default)
[personal profile] rone

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
The question i have is, what does twenty 1789 dollars come out to be in today's currency?

Oh, and another question: why twenty dollars?

Date: 2006-03-03 01:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dr-strych9.livejournal.com
No, just muddled the distinction between matters of common law and equity. The twenty dollars figure is a kinda vestigial thing in the law now. The thing you care about now is what the figure has to be for you to get out of small claims court.

Why is this burning a hole in your hat?

Date: 2006-03-03 01:12 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (quiet)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Just idly pondering the scads of legacy code we have in our Constitution. Or not even legacy code so much as driver code for a device that was EOLed decades ago.

Date: 2006-03-03 02:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
I've often thought that in the technology of the modern democratic republic we suffer somewhat from early adopter troubles.

Date: 2006-03-03 03:06 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (bofh)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
More like modern democratic republics suffer from second-system effect...

Date: 2006-03-03 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Some of that too.

Date: 2006-03-03 07:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eejitalmuppet.livejournal.com
You have early adopter troubles with your democracy (I'm cheerfully ignoring the "republic" part)? Try having an unelected second chamber.

Date: 2006-03-05 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
I'll admit that not even the current US administration has seriously proposed anything this scary. (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1072-2049791,00.html)

Date: 2006-03-05 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
...on the other hand, they do have the strange tendency to insist that the President's status as commander-in-chief of the armed forces somehow makes all checks on executive power inoperative.

Date: 2006-03-05 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eejitalmuppet.livejournal.com
Indeedy, and I have to confess that this one had slipped under my own radar until now. It seems further confirmation, if any were needed [1], that we are heading for a certain creek, without a certain implement.

[1] In a similar-but-different "oh shit" vein, the other day saw the strange and scary experience of Tony Blair citing his religious faith when defending the war in Iraq. I know that certain US politicians like to invoke some bloke in the sky at every opportunity, to justify any number of heinous activities (if he does support half the things he is claimed to be in favour of, I'm all for impeachment of deities), but such God references are a genuine rarity over here.

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 02:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios