resurfacing for air
Dec. 11th, 2005 09:54 pmAfter about 48 hours of Civ4, i'll have to catch up to see what i've been missing. I will say this: the so-called "minimum" and "recommended" system requirements, as far as RAM goes, are a joke. The game sucks up 410 MB of RAM, and i saw it hogging over 700 MB of virtual memory after i exited the game. When your stripped-down Win2K installation uses 180 MB of memory just sitting there, it's inescapable that you need a minimum of 640 MB, and you should really get a gigabyte in there to be comfy.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-15 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 06:34 am (UTC)Fortunately for me, I'm awful at Civilization, so I can generally get slaughtered before I even explore the medium map.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 03:21 pm (UTC)BUT I STILL WISH TO PLAY IT.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 04:53 pm (UTC)Have you done any multiplayer stuff? I was trying to play Civ3 with
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 05:50 pm (UTC)I haven't played multiplayer yet. I tried Play By E Mail (PBEM) but found it lacking some very basic features. I was hoping I could just point it at a POP server and a SMTP server and let it manage it. Turns out you have to handle email attachments manually. Hassle.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-12 06:45 pm (UTC)i will not succumb to the urge to play civ 4.
i will not.
really, i won't. you cannot tempt me.
--stevi
so any really cool new wonders?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 02:46 am (UTC)a better patch
Date: 2005-12-13 02:36 am (UTC)it makes a huge difference in terms of memory hoggitude.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-13 02:41 am (UTC)I was too
Date: 2005-12-13 03:06 am (UTC)I can't say for certain that it's not eating out my RAM from the inside, but I'm happy with what it did for Civ4.