"batman begins"
Jul. 11th, 2005 12:36 pmI think i've avoided writing about the movie because it would just be an exercise in nerdiness that i could avoid. But then
mmcirvin posted his thoughts on the movie and, gosh darn it, if he's not above it, why should i?
I didn't mind Katie Holmes's acting; i think that the character was poorly written (perhaps even poorly conceived), and she made the best of it. I was surprised by the special guest appearance of her nipples in the final scenes; maybe Christian Bale's a hell of a kisser.
I liked Bale's Batman voice. I thought it was effective. I was confused by the juggling of Ra's Al Ghul's identity — was Ken Watanabe really Ra's and Ducard usurped the name afterwards, or was Ducard Ra's all along and Watanabe played... someone else? Gah! CONFUSION. Gary Oldman was so good, it pissed me off that they deviated so far from Frank Miller's Batman: Year One; the book gives almost equal time to Gordon (as well as Catwoman, but she's not even in the movie, so whatever), and the lack of development of Gordon's character is a huge missed opportunity. Tom Wilkinson kicked ass and needed more screen time (but i've liked him in every movie i've seen him). Cillian Murphy was spooky. Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine, well, i won't say they phoned it in, but they didn't exactly stretch themselves, either.
One thing that really bothered me was Batman's rush to save Katie Holmes. I know i'm being a big nerd here, but Batman would never be so careless as to crush civilian and cop cars just to save some chick's life. Another annoyance was the conversion of Flass from an overbearing Green Beret asshole to a seedy donut-eater who was more apathetic than corrupt. Overall, though, the movie was fun, well-written, and well-paced (people who complained about the "slow beginning" should be locked into an Ingmar Bergman festival until they recant).
In conclusion, go read Batman: Year One. You might even find it at the library. Do it now.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:39 pm (UTC)Ducard was Ra's all along. Watanabe was just a decoy.
I'm sure they wanted to save Catwoman for a future film.
Did Freeman and Caine need to stretch themselves? I thought each was fine.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:43 pm (UTC)They didn't NEED to stretch themselves, but it seems like a waste to have excellent actors play a role that's so... eh.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 09:34 pm (UTC)Hannibal sez ...
Date: 2005-07-12 10:13 am (UTC)As well, Bale had been Batman, what, a few weeks when he did the car chase? He wasn't the Bat God we've come to know and love. He was, in many ways, a shmuck still learning. Later, he'd probably say, "Maybe I need a sleeker Batmobile, and to cause less damage ... and maybe set up a fund to take care of victims of my carelessness ..."
Freeman was amused at the role, and it showed. "Oh the Tumbler? You wouldn't be interested in _that_!" Best line in the movie, to me. Oldman was downplayed, which was indeed a loss.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:42 pm (UTC)see, i liked that part. remember, this is young batman. he's still feeling his way around. he's also got a lot more hormones in play than the older version. my take was that he'd look back on it later and think, "holy collateral damage, batman!" and realize he can't go doing that kind of thing on a regular basis.
maybe i'm wrong. but that was how i saw it.
otherwise, we're in 100% agreement.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 10:26 pm (UTC)Well, I can also GO for that. But anyway. ;p
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:43 pm (UTC)And I will not stop complaining about how long that car chase was until it stops being so long.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:53 pm (UTC)I took the exact opposite view about Ducard's identity: Ducard picked up Ra's' name when the original Ra's was killed by the falling beam. Confusingly written either way, and that was the least of it: what was the League of Shadows' motivation, again? Kill petty criminals in the name of Law, but also sack and destroy major civilian cities in the name of Balance? That was either two script rewrites away or five rewrites past making any sense whatsoever.
And incidentally, this movie deserves its own entry on the Evil Overlord List: when I am an Evil Overlord, I will not keep open barrels of gunpowder in the main chamber of my mountain fortress. My wooden mountain fortress. The gunpowder, and all other explosives, will be stored in a locked metal shed at least 200 meters from my fortress, and only my trained combat engineers will have keys.
Every time Katie Holmes appeared on screen, it was like the film had an intermission. It was almost spooky: a perfect Negative Zone of non-acting.
The fight choreography and editing was baaaaaad. I know Liam Neeson is not a spring chicken any more, but would it have killed them to hold a single shot for more than .5 seconds?
For all of that bitching, I basically liked the movie a lot. The supporting cast was (excepting Holmes) great, and Bale was pitch-perfect even though he got saddled with all of the film's worst lines. I'm cautiously optimstic that they'll work out the kinks for the next film: less need for expository dialog and a conspicuous lack of crazed scientologist starlets can only improve matters.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 07:59 pm (UTC)I thought that in the early ninja fights, the crappy choreography was OK, as it conveyed the confusion you might experience in such a fight. But it was really terrible in the train fight.
Also, note that this is pre-brainwashing Katie. I can only imagine how bad she'll be after this.
Finally, your absence from your own journal has been very conspicuous, so it's good to know you're still around.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 09:24 pm (UTC)Read me Doctor Memory?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 09:26 pm (UTC)Not that you would, ah, know anything about that, eh?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 10:20 pm (UTC)Yessssssss, worker?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 01:31 am (UTC)When I first heard that album, I thought Dr. Memory's voice was a specific Reagan reference. I guess it is still possible, since he was governor when Bozos came out, right?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 09:43 pm (UTC)and that's why they'll never let you be an Evil Overlord. you obviously need to go back and re-read your notes from class. it clearly states in the regulations that all secret fortresses must have a fatal flaw. i think an open barrel of gunpowder lying around in a wooden fortress meets that requirement just fine.
re: the fight choreography, i actually kind of liked it, and i'm a huge action/kung fu movie fan. to me, it felt quite realistic -- things happen so fast you don't even have time to understand what's going on, in the bits with ra's (and i think it was liam neeson all along). and in the bits with other guys, it just shows you that bats is so good that no normal even has a chance against him.
ok, i admit, i'd have liked to see a little more of what was going on. but it didn't ruin the movie for me. nothing could've ruined that movie for me, except maybe giving katie holmes more lines.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 08:35 pm (UTC)Point: wasn't Batboy&Robingirl the one with your governor?
Point: It has been predetermined in discussion that your governor. Well, I mean, your governor.
And it's been a rather serious discussion, the conclusion was that the SO likes the one with your governor more because it has the arse of Clooney hidden somewhere, and I would slap the writer who's had the fucking idea of fucking Ninja training so hard, he'd wake up on Uranus (if he's tough).
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 08:55 pm (UTC)Personally, I'm still undecided.
In other words: your governor (was born not far enough from here).
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 10:23 pm (UTC)I agree. At first I was like "OMG, so bad", but then I realized that there was really no point to her being in the movie. At all. See, if we'd seen her actually being an ADA (or whatever her official position was) at some point, or something, that would've been cool. (I speak from almost total ignorance of the Batman mythos, so if that's something that happens later or something...fine. They still could've written her better, à la Gordon. Although, even if Holmes is better than this movie suggests, Oldman can still act circles around her.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-11 11:33 pm (UTC)but yeah, basically she was written in because they felt they needed a love interest and for some reason, Commissioner Gordon's lovely daughter whatshername (who later becomes Batgirl -- shhhh, don't tell Bruce!) wasn't good enough for them.
i can't imagine why. at least she'd have made some sort of sense that way. instead of tossing in that crap where she LJBF's him -- i mean, honestly, who would LJBF him? holy crap, he's hot, he's a good guy, he's crazy rich, and he's a fucking superhero! -- they could've dragged out the sexual tension, with him having to keep concealing his identity from her because OMFG Gordon is her dad, and her eventually figuring it out and not letting on that she knows.
or, to put it more succinctly, Katie Holmes' character was the token chick.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 02:27 am (UTC)Agreed -- I liked the raw edge to it. I think it really helped get across the fact that you are dealing with a seriously deranged psychotic who needs to dress up in rodent-ish fetish gear and beat people up in order to feel even the smallest shred of peace. It's a damn shame that most Batman stuff out there (well, okay, at least most of the stuff I've read/seen) seems to gloss over this.
I was confused by the juggling of Ra's Al Ghul's identity — was Ken Watanabe really Ra's and Ducard usurped the name afterwards, or was Ducard Ra's all along and Watanabe played... someone else? Gah! CONFUSION.
Huh. Ducard felt like RAG to me shortly into the training scenes, particularly given how little of Watanbe we see. RAG doesn't strike me as someone who would delegate the majority of the training of his Chosen One to someone else. Once I saw the little goatee bits on Ducard at Wayne Manor, it didn't even cross my mind that RAG could be anyone other than Ducard the entire time.
Gary Oldman was so good, it pissed me off that they deviated so far from Frank Miller's Batman: Year One; the book gives almost equal time to Gordon (as well as Catwoman, but she's not even in the movie, so whatever), and the lack of development of Gordon's character is a huge missed opportunity.
While I think 'BM: Year One' is a superb (and better) story, I'm somewhat boggled that you would even consider that 'Batman Begins' would have been an adaptation of it. I thought the whole time BB was being promoted as another Batman origin story, incorporating a few elements from Year One. Did I miss something?
I think a Year One adaptation would be sweet, but I don't think you could do justice to either the Wayne or Gordon stories if you tried to include both within the limitations of a single movie.
One thing that really bothered me was Batman's rush to save Katie Holmes. I know i'm being a big nerd here, but Batman would never be so careless as to crush civilian and cop cars just to save some chick's life.
This bugged me, too. But as others have pointed out, he's brand new at this, and this is the first time he's really driven his monstrosity like that. It'll be nice if a sequal shows a nice learning curve in a few areas, nicely emphasizing how much of an amateur he really was to begin with.
In conclusion, go read Batman: Year One. You might even find it at the library. Do it now.
Amen, brutha.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 02:38 am (UTC)One reason i don't buy the "he's new at this" explanation for the car chase is that, in B:YO, even after he forces the cop car where he's arrested to crash, he pulls the two cops to safety even though he's been shot.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-12 04:46 am (UTC)And yeah, good point on the B:YO scene.