A federal judge on Thursday blocked a county school system from instituting a health curriculum that includes discussions of homosexuality.
U.S. District Judge Alexander Williams agreed with two groups that sued contending such discussions gave preference of religions that are tolerant of homosexuality over those that reject it.
Religions that are tolerant of homosexuality... like, what, Buddhism? I love how fundamentalist Christian groups are using freedom of religion as a mallet in their fight against gays, as well as in their push to establish Creationism as a legitimate science. "Your message of tolerance oppresses my religious right to hate fags and evolution! Filthy hippays!"
In this case, Defendants [Montgomery Co. Schools] open up the classroom to the subject of homosexuality, and specifically, the moral rightness of the homosexual lifestyle. However, the Revised Curriculum presents only one view on the subject - that homosexuality is a natural and morally correct lifestyle - to the exclusion of other perspectives...
- Judge Alexander Williams
This insane trend that you may teach something only if you also include any and all opposing viewpoints must be stamped out. Seriously, what's the next step? Teaching
Alexander Abian's "Equivalence of Mass and Time" as part of any quantum mechanics class?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 05:21 pm (UTC)And all that was in the 1980s and 1990s. Never thought I'd see the day when MCPS would be this regressive. Christ.
(Wait. Yes, I would. This is the same school system that used bussing to overcome demographics when I was a kid, in order to avoid the appearance of racial segregation in school enrollment. It's a long, ugly story, including the bit where a reporter for a local paper accused my mother of being racist because she thought magnet program enrollment shouldn't take student race into account. So never mind.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 05:49 pm (UTC)Apparently, I just have no idea.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 06:15 pm (UTC)religions tolerant of homosexuality
Date: 2005-05-06 06:50 pm (UTC)Re: religions tolerant of homosexuality
Date: 2005-05-06 07:28 pm (UTC)He asked, "like, what, Buddhism?"
Date: 2005-05-06 11:09 pm (UTC)Now, I have friends who left A.M.E. Zion over this issue, so just how tolerant each of these churches really is is still a valid question, but I think it's significant that such a broad group joined in this statement.
Re: religions tolerant of homosexuality
Date: 2005-05-06 09:50 pm (UTC)You can go back 50 for that pretty safely.
60 pushes it, my grandfather had issues. (LCA Chaplin, US Navy.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 07:07 pm (UTC)he's so fucking weird.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 07:13 pm (UTC)Like the First Church of Ass-fucking, I guess.
Other than evolution and relativity, what are some other scientific "theories" that must stay "theories" because they can't be proven or disproven? I'm serious- I'd like to start a counter-protest over something like Magnetism (is there scientific Proof that it exists, or have we just not found anything to disprove it?) to educate these people what "theory" means.
>This insane trend that you may teach something only if you also include any and all opposing viewpoints must be stamped out.
The Comfort Women in Japan liked it! Native Americans were happy to have those blankets, even if some of them got smallpox! The Reign of Terror in France was just misunderstood!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 07:48 pm (UTC)Same thing with magnetism. Magnetism is an observed fact. We have a theory that accounts for the facts, but it's just the current best fit. It could be replaced with something better next week -- granted, after years of refinement, the burden of proof on the something better is immense, but it could happen.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-07 02:00 am (UTC)I AM THE SHOVER ELF.
I PUSH THINGS AROUND.
WE ARE HERE TO PROTECT YOU
WE ARE HERE TO PROTECT YOU
WE ARE HERE TO PROTECT YOU
FROM THE TERRIBLE SECRET OF SCIENCE.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-07 04:03 am (UTC)I feebly attempted to explain to him what the Second Law actually says, then STFU when I realized that one can never, ever, win an argument with root.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-07 05:11 am (UTC)theory and fact
Date: 2005-05-06 11:28 pm (UTC)The problem, of course, is not in labeling this theory a theory, but in the general public's misunderstanding of how the word "theory" is used in science. As long as people can continue to get away with saying "just a theory" about this or any other scientific theory, actual science will have to keep competing with folklore and superstition in public science education.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 09:45 pm (UTC)(Tho I'm not gay, I just believe in freedom as something which all humans deserve - wrong word, just got up after 14 hour escape flight post-sleep - require isn't it. Anyway... liberty and freedom for all. And liberty and freedom aren't weapons to be used to smother or incinerate.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-07 02:45 am (UTC)And this decision doesn't give preference of relgions that are intolerant of homoexuality? What the fucking fuckity fuck?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-07 03:07 am (UTC)