proselytism
Jan. 6th, 2004 11:14 amI am throwing my support behind Wesley Clark (not merely because of this, that is, but it's a good quote).
"If [Republican strategist] Karl Rove is watching today, Karl, I want you to hear me loud and clear: I am going to provide tax cuts to ease the burdens for 31 million American families -- and lift hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty -- by raising the taxes on 0.1 percent of families -- those who make more than $1,000,000 a year. You don't have to read my lips, I'm saying it," Clark said.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 11:25 am (UTC)go clark!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:10 pm (UTC)Dean's record is consistently to the right of Clinton's and the rest of the DLC.
Research!
(this seething brought to you by hearing that same damn line since July)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:44 pm (UTC)and yes, i really am, for the first time in my entire life, so afraid for my country that i'm seriously willing to go the "anyone-but" route.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:47 pm (UTC)and speaking as a nerd, i'm pretty comfortable saying most nerds i've met aren't up to those challenges. i know i'm not.
i should probably step out of this discussion entirely before i end up in a flamewar i haven't got the patience to finish.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 01:08 pm (UTC)While I'm writing this, a two-hour debate hosted by NPR is wrapping up. Clark didn't appear because he's not campaigning in Iowa (where the debate is being held). Dean spent most of his time fending off attacks by Lieberman, Kerry and Gephart, all of whom are hell-bent on being the anti-Dean. Kucinich brought visual aids, so he's jumped the shark. Carol Moseley Braun made the best show, but only because she wasn't part of the four-way tussle and was left to state her positions rather than attack or defend the other candidates.
I think it's already down to a Clark/Dean face-off. A Dean-Clark or Clark-Dean ticket in the fall would be a Democrat dream, but whether it happens will depend too much on how much blood is spilled in the primary.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 02:11 pm (UTC)And on the random "good quotes from Clark" tip, I liked the one where when he was asked how it was possible for a general to be running as a Democrat instead of a Republican, he said, "Well, you know, I might have tried being a Republican, except Karl Rove wouldn't return any of my phone calls." Haha.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 05:57 pm (UTC)Which led to the obvious question as to why it wasn't possible to search the same phone logs to get to the bottom of the Valerie Plame business, but that is another story.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 06:02 pm (UTC)Government-wise (as opposed to politics-wise), the best thing might be for either one to have a cabinet-level post in the other's administration; say Clark as Secretary of Defense, State or national security advisor, or Dean as Secretary of HHS.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 06:06 pm (UTC)Other people have been urging him to pick Jesse Jackson Jr., but I don't think that's gonna happen.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 06:14 am (UTC)Rich people were arguably being punished by the tax structure that existed prior to the Reagan administration. The pendulum has swung absurdly far in the other direction since then, and conservatives unabashedly speak now of wanting poor people to get soaked even more, ostensibly with the idea that they'll advocate smaller government then. (The favored rhetorical trick is to point out that destitute "lucky duckies" don't pay any income tax, as if that were the only kind of tax.)
Somehow this method of shrinking the government is better than, you know, actually just shrinking the government, probably because the shrinking part takes place in some unspecified future in which somebody else makes the hard decisions. Kind of like how the Republicans used to want to balance the budget by passing a constitutional amendment requiring people to magically balance the budget. Strange how you don't hear much about that any more.
Those who call this kind of talk "class warfare" are just trying to prevent retaliation for first strikes.
And that is my liberal soapbox speech for the week.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 08:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 08:08 am (UTC)"Something dee oh oh economics?" You really ought to read Al Franken's "Lies", lots42. Feel free to skip over the humor and head straight to the parts where he explains how the poor get taxed.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 01:54 pm (UTC)I can't generate any sympathy for the problems of the wealthy. None whatsoever. Go ahead, make me wealthy, and I'll tell you how much I suffer. If it sucked so much, so many people wouldn't be aspiring to it.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 03:35 pm (UTC)That said, the tax code is not perfect and there are things in it that create perverse incentives. A good example is the Alternative Minimum Tax. This was a well-intentioned means of closing some loopholes that allowed millionaire CEOs to avoid paying most of their income tax by being compensated in creative ways. But an unintended side effect is to make it dangerous to hold onto stock obtained as a result of exercising employee stock options, because if the value goes down you can end up being taxed under the AMT on money you never actually had, something that can really wipe you out if you're not prepared for it. The result is that people almost always dump the stock immediately, and options no longer function as a means of encouraging employees to invest in their own companies, which is something the tax code generally tries to promote.