Date: 2008-02-24 04:47 pm (UTC)
"for management of the local server, you're at the mercy of someone who probably doesn't care."

Actually, the manager of the local server is usually someone who wants you to pay them— it's the managers of the other servers in the path who don't care about you.

In fact, this is— I think— the root of the problem with Usenet and just about anything else that acts even vaguely like this: everybody between the senders and the receivers needs to have incentives to protect the integrity of the network. The NNTP protocol couldn't let news server administrators do that, even with the conventions that Usenet II were trying to develop. The system of Web 2.0 protocols, which has now replaced NNTP for the purpose of facilitating global group communication, mostly paper over the problem by removing the requirement for administrators in the middle. This means it isn't any better really at facilitating group communication, and in some important ways it's worse, but at least middlemen have to do something actually useful to justify the role in the network they aim to serve. Otherwise, the system just ignores them.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 02:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios