rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones ([personal profile] rone) wrote2009-04-21 10:34 pm

all aboard the fail train

Consider the site stocktwits dot com (not linked directly to deny them any sort of "Google juice").  Not only would it be a fantastically stupid idea at any given moment, but given the current financial milieu, it exudes an extra special miasma of stupid, aided in no small part by the cleverly stupid domain name which goes past the "so stupid it's clever" hipster irony of cool all the way into the heart of "so clever it's stupid" territory all over again.

Needless to say, neutering the people involved would be a public service.

ext_243: (stupid)

[identity profile] xlerb.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 06:09 am (UTC)(link)
Not only can I not tell from looking at the website what the point of it is, but I can't even tell what they think the point is.

[identity profile] dagbrown.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 07:45 am (UTC)(link)
Truly, no web site has had a more apropos name.

[identity profile] skapusniak.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 08:29 am (UTC)(link)
Alternatively it's not what you think. It's that they have all standard specification twits you need in stock for immediate dispatch and next day delivery!

...

Cue TV commercial where generic officeworker on a deadline opens the door to the twit cupboard and finds *all the mission critical twits are gone* (sirens, alarm, zoom in dolly back). At which point loud shouty man enters wall right (generating rubble) and starts loudly shouting that they should go to stocktwits dot com.

Fade to black screen, with text 'stocktwits dot com, we stock twits' as shouty man continues to shout.

Cut back to shouty man, officeworker cringing at shoutiness.

Next commercial.

...

Possibly.

[identity profile] brong.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 10:09 am (UTC)(link)
Do they stock round twits, or only the more common square variety?
ext_181967: (Default)

[identity profile] waider.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Depends on the shape of the hole you're trying to bang them into.

Apropos of nothing

[identity profile] tomscud.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe the word "fail" should be retired from public use. At least for a cooling-off period.

Re: Apropos of nothing

[identity profile] wisn.livejournal.com 2009-04-22 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Hush, you. I've got failtwits dotcom in the works and I'm not going to let doomsayers like you keep me from making millions on it.

..twits

[identity profile] lammah.livejournal.com 2009-04-23 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
Fuck(t)wits...

C'mon, if I see one more 'cat /dev/twitter | grep shiznit | mail -s "l00k @dis maaang' play, I'll have to deliver some whoopass.

Re: ..twits

[identity profile] epileptikitty.livejournal.com 2009-04-23 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
That's a Trade Secret. You'll hear from my lawyers.

Hey God Hater Death Monkey!

[identity profile] drieuxster.livejournal.com 2009-04-24 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
Fail has officially been recalled for Anti-Americanism, and your considered usage of it makes it clear that you are in league with the
Killer Shooter Shoe Laces From Outer Space
and must report to the TSA for further transportation until you get Your Americanism ON!

Americans who fail to stay abreast of the Current MemeWars, are all evil unamericanists who want the Terrorists To Rebrand....