rone: (Default)
entombed in the shrine of zeroes and ones ([personal profile] rone) wrote2003-06-26 08:56 am
Entry tags:

scalia the rapscallion

[Supreme Court Justice Antonin] Scalia said the Texas ban did not infringe a "fundamental right." [...] "The court has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda," Scalia wrote for the three, according to the AP. [...] "The court has taken sides in the culture war," Scalia said, adding that he has "nothing against homosexuals."
It must be a horrible thing for a man as smart as Scalia to be reduced to saying things like "the so-called homosexual agenda" and noting he doesn't have a problem with gay people.  And if having sex in your own home isn't a fundamental right, what the hell is?

[identity profile] tritone.livejournal.com 2003-06-26 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
In which America, exactly, is it proper for a Supreme Court opinion--supposedly the ultimate expression of objective deliberation in the nation--to refer to a "culture war"?
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (evil)

[identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com 2003-06-26 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
As [livejournal.com profile] dr_memory put it so eloquently (http://www.livejournal.com/users/dr_memory/45356.html), "Scalia's dissent is... like seeing the most groan-inducing bits of an old alt.politics.homosexuality flamewar enshrined as national canon."