Entry tags:
you say you've never read any discworld books?
This would be a good place to find out where to start. The latest version (1.21) is missing "A Hat Full of Sky", which is the third book in the "Maurice"-"Wee Free Men" arc. I am, of course, a huge Vimes fan, so i'd recommend the first row first.
no subject
I started with "The Color of Magic" and "The Light Fantastic," which of course were the first written and most unformed in style, but I found them pretty amusing nevertheless. After that I think I skipped to reading some of the Death books, "Mort" and "Reaper Man" and the rest; Death was the first character who really grabbed me. It was interesting to see Pratchett's style grow up; "Reaper Man" particularly bowled me over, that Pratchett allowed himself to put so much genuinely moving material in what was ostensibly a humor book. I've always thought of the Discworld series as progressing gradually from parody to satire, and maybe to some extent to out-and-out serious fantasy worldbuilding.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
All right, so they're two characters. But neither would be as mind-bogglingly excellent without the other.
I don't know why some books are tagged as "starter novels" and some aren't. Or maybe I do: it looks like a "starter novel" is defined as one that has no plot links, even minor ones, with a previously-written book. But some of those plot links are very minor; there's no reason you can't read e.g. Wee Free Men before Maurice; likewise just because you haven't read Moving Pictures doesn't mean you can't handle The Truth.*
Personally I think The Truth is a fine place to start, but that's just me. (Anal me, who started with The Colour of Magic and read the series pretty much in order from there -- of course, there were only about eight or ten books in the series at the time.)
* This whole comment was just an excuse to use that gag.
no subject
Now we just need something like this for Wodehouse...although with all the short stories and tenuous links, it'll probably look even more topologically improbable.
no subject
no subject
I'd probably be Nobes...
no subject
I can see you as Nobby, oh yeah.
no subject
no subject
no subject