ext_2818 ([identity profile] dawn-guy.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rone 2008-07-03 09:42 pm (UTC)

I think Postel said it better (for this situation) in RFC 760 section 3.2:
The implementation of a protocol must be robust. Each implementation must expect to interoperate with others created by different individuals. While the goal of this specification is to be explicit about the protocol there is the possibility of differing interpretations. In general, an implementation should be conservative in its sending behavior, and liberal in its receiving behavior. That is, it should be careful to send well-formed datagrams, but should accept any datagram that it can interpret (e.g., not object to technical errors where the meaning is still clear).
Whether you care to point out Eric Allman's strong support of extending Postel's philosophy to mail transfer is up to you.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org