Here we glimpse a possible fusion between the turgid routines of MoveOn.org and the filmic standards, if not exactly the filmic skills, of Sergei Eisenstein or Leni Riefenstahl.
Leni Riefenstahl? This is the silliest attempt to invoke Godwin's Law (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/) I've seen in print. Why bother with the director of Triumph of the Will (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0025913/) when you can just say "Hitler! Hitler! Hitler!" and save us all the trouble of reading the rest of the article?
This is not a review. This is, as Randy noted, a continuation of a personal vendetta against Moore.
Christopher Hitchens' gig is tearing down figures that other people idolize (e.g. Mother Theresa), and he's widely considered to be a neo-con chickenhawk, so that's going to disqualify this article automatically in the minds of a lot of people.
Based on his previous films, I've come to expect Moore to contradict himself and play fast and loose with the facts, what bothers me more is the fraudulent way he has promoted this film, claiming censorship by Miramax and Disney when in fact, there was none.
Bottom line for me: I just think it's sad that someone as obnoxious, cheap, hysterical, and smug as Moore has become an elder spokesman for progressive politics.
no subject
from the article
So.... he didn't bother fact-checking?
That article is a collection of straw-man and ad hominem attacks while Hitchens masturbates with his thesaurus. Not very convincing.
(no subject)
After seeing the film,
no subject
Leni Riefenstahl? This is the silliest attempt to invoke Godwin's Law (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/) I've seen in print. Why bother with the director of Triumph of the Will (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0025913/) when you can just say "Hitler! Hitler! Hitler!" and save us all the trouble of reading the rest of the article?
This is not a review. This is, as Randy noted, a continuation of a personal vendetta against Moore.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Based on his previous films, I've come to expect Moore to contradict himself and play fast and loose with the facts, what bothers me more is the fraudulent way he has promoted this film, claiming censorship by Miramax and Disney when in fact, there was none.
Bottom line for me: I just think it's sad that someone as obnoxious, cheap, hysterical, and smug as Moore has become an elder spokesman for progressive politics.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Heh
Wierd