![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
s-m-r-t
Last week, i had a job interview (i'm looking because i'm tired of the night shift and i'm bored as hell and there hasn't been an opening in either the day shift of my group or in another group that i'm qualified for; that might change in 2 or 3 months, but i'm not willing to wait longer than that), and when i asked two of the guys who had just started working there what they liked best about their new employer, they both talked about how smart everyone was. This made me wince on the inside, because in my experience, smarts only get you so far. In systems operations, it's much more important to have people who work hard and play well with others than to have some super-sharp person bursting at the seams with cleverness and grand ideas, especially in an industry where it's often too easy to find a brilliant yet intractable coworker who's tolerated because of what they can do whenever they stop being an asshole. Perhaps i'm biased, but i'd rather see the smart kids doing the programming so that us worker bees can get on with making the infrastructure hum. I'm so glad i'm a Beta. Or something.
no subject
Even, perhaps especially, when by most metrics they are the most productive coders in the group. There's this bit of folklore that says the most productive programmers are two orders of magnitude more productive than the average, and every boss thinks, man, if I could only hire those guys and just lay off everyone else! But this is not necessarily wise.
I've read that metric, and I hate it ...
Re: I've read that metric, and I hate it ...
Re: I've read that metric, and I hate it ...